13 C
Buenos Aires
viernes, mayo 17, 2024

Israel’s State Terrorism

Opinion/IdeasIsrael's State Terrorism

Israel’s State Terrorism

By Lev Grinberg

What is the difference between State terrorism and individual terrorist acts? If we understand this difference we’ll understand also the evilness of the US policies in the Middle East and the forthcoming disasters. When Yassir Arafat was put under siege in his offices and kept hostage by the Israeli occupation forces, he was constantly pressed into condemning terror and combatting terrorism. Israel’s State terrorism is defined by US officials as “self-defense”, while individual suicide bombers are called terrorists.

The only “small” difference is that Israeli aggression is the direct responsibility of Ariel Sharon, Benjamin Ben Eliezer, Shimon Peres and Shaul Mofaz, while the individual terrorist acts are done by individuals in despair, usually against Arafat’s will. One hour after Arafat declared his support of a cease fire and wished the Jews a Happy Passover feast, a suicide bomber exploded himself in an hotel in Netanya, killing 22 innocent Jews celebrating Passover. Arafat was blamed as responsible for this act, and the present IDF offensive has been justified through this accusation.

At the same time, Sharon’s responsibility for Israeli war crimes is being completely ignored. Who should be arrested for the targeted killing of almost 100 Palestinians? Who will be sent to jail for the killing of more than 120 Palestinian paramedics? Who will be sentenced for the killing of more than 1,200 Palestinians and for the collective punishment of more than 3,000,000 civilians during the last 18 months?

And who will face the International Tribunal for the illegal settlement of occupied Palestinian Lands, and the disobedience of UN decisions for more than 35 years? Suicide bombs killing innocent citizens must be unequivocally condemned; they are immoral acts, and their perpetrators should be sent to jail. But they cannot be compared to State terrorism carried out by the Israeli Government. The former are individual acts of despair of a people that sees no future, vastly ignored by an unfair and distorted international public opinion. The latter are cold and “rational” decisions of a State and a military apparatus of occupation, well equipped, financed and backed by the only superpower in the world Yet in the public debate, State terrorism and individual suicide bombs are not even considered as comparable cases of terrorism. The State terror and war crimes perpetrated by the Israeli Government are legitimized as “self-defense”, while Arafat, even under siege, is demanded to arrest “terrorists”.

I want to ask: Who will arrest Sharon, the person directly responsible for the orders to kill Palestinians? When is he going to be defined a terrorist too? How long will the world ignore the Palestinian cry that all they want is freedom and independence? When will it stop neglecting the fact that the goal of the Israeli Government is not security, but the continued occupation and subjugation of the Palestinian people?

As Israelis in the opposition, we are fighting against our government, but the international support that Sharon receives is constantly jeopardizing our struggle. The whole international public opinion must be reverted, and the UN must deploy intervention forces in order to stop the bloodshed and the imminent deterioration. Israelis and Palestinians desperately need the awakening of the international community’s public opinion and a reversal in the global attitude. These are needed both in order to save our lives (literally), and preserve our hope in a better future. The source: Dr. Lev Grinberg is a political sociologist, and Director of the Humphrey Institute for Social Research at Ben Gurion University.

Más

El desempleo en Medio Oriente y África es el más alto en el mundo

La tasa de desempleo en Medio Oriente y el norte de África, tanto en lo que se refiere al desempleo juvenil como al total, es la más alta del mundo, según un estudio que considera que la reducción de la tasa de desempleo juvenil a la mitad se reflejaría en un incremento sustancial del producto interior bruto. El desempleo juvenil es el síntoma de una pobre actuación económica. El estudio subraya la importancia de estimular la inversión privada y la apertura al comercio internacional mediante la mejora de la competitividad. Escribe Yaber Qarmuti.

Estados Unidos y Palestina, ahora

Para el autor, ni palestinos ni árabes en general deben caer en la fácil retórica norteamericana. No es aceptable sentarse en las salas de reunión de Beirut o El Cairo y denunciar el imperialismo norteamericano (o el colonialismo sionista, para el caso) sin un ápice de comprensión de la complejidad de estas sociedades, que no siempre son representadas con veracidad por las estúpidas o crueles políticas de sus gobiernos. Nunca hemos abordado, ni en Estados Unidos ni en Israel, a las corrientes que es factible y de hecho vital que abordemos, y que a la larga lleguemos a acuerdos con ellas. Necesitamos que nuestra resistencia se entienda y sea respetada, no odiada o temida como lo es ahora en virtud de la ignorancia suicida y la beligerancia indiscriminada.

Fatal vision: how Bush has given up on peace

Fatal vision: how Bush has...

Por qué comparo a Bush con Hitler

El embajador de los Estados Unidos en Uruguay, Martin Silverstein, acusó al diario La República de carecer "de toda medida de integridad periodística" por comparar a su presidente, George Bush, con el canciller del Tercer Reich alemán, Adolfo Hitler. En este artículo, el director del diario uruguayo da una respuesta pública al diplomático norteamericano. Escribe Federico Fasano Mertens.

Morality is not on our side

Morality is not on our...

La construcción de la identidad israelí: génesis, problemáticas y contradicciones

En este trabajo se aborda el fenómeno de la construcción de la identidad israelí. Para el autor, hasta que no se resuelva la problemática de entender al judaísmo desvinculado de toda rigidez étnica y nacionalista, el enfoque y la relación del Estado de Israel, tanto interna como externamente, seguirá siendo conflictiva. Un estilo tradicional de nación quizás ya no sea el modelo a seguir en el actual y sofisticado conflicto israelí / palestino. Más aun cuando todavía Israel se encuentra en la búsqueda no ya de definir límites fronterizos fijos, sino en poner mojones en la fluctuante divisoria de identidades de sus mismos ciudadanos, entre el preciso israelí y el indefinido ser judío. Escribe Andrés Criscaut.